Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The Global Middle Class

February 14th, the Economist published a series of articles on the global middle class; among the topics were how important the middle class is for emerging market economies to successfully develop. This is because the middle class takes on certain characteristics depending on its overall size. High commodity prices and a large volume of exports fueled the economic boom that allowed so many individuals in emerging markets to move up into the middle class. But the financial crisis could have serious consequences for the new middle class as the recession hits harder and businessmen are forced to cut production and reduced the size of their workforce.

Currently, the middle class makes up over half the world’s population with 80 million more added each year. But the term “global middle class” is relatively broad; it can mean income levels of anywhere from the equivalent of $10-100 a day. For this reason many economists consider there to be two different middle classes, those that would be considered middle class in any country and those that would be considered middle class only in developing countries. The second definition is basically a measure of how many people live just above the poverty line and are able to purchase items other than basic necessities. This group makes up a largest portion of the “new middle class” and is the most vulnerable to shifts in the global economy. Their margin from middle class to poverty is relatively small therefore once a fraction of their income is taken away or if they lose their job, a significant portion of the new middle class could once again fall back below the poverty line.

Although their level of affluence is much lower, the new middle class has become the consumers driving emerging market economies. An increasing consumer base has allowed a variety of businesses to proliferate including those producing things like cell phones, cars, cloths, prepared meals and private education. When the consumer base increases, the industrial sector expands to provide more jobs for more people. The result is a larger portion of the population climbing up the income latter and into the new global middle class.

After WWII the American middle class expanded rapidly leading the way for unprecedented levels of wealth and innovation. Middle class populations tend to boom rather than incrementally expand with growth, for instance the Chinese middle class made up just 15% of the population in 1990 but reached 62% in 2005. The size of the group is important; middle class behavior takes on different attributes depending on its relative size within the economy. A relatively small middle class will tend to emulate the rich - who typically are more risk averse. This is because the rich are comfortable with their current income level and want to protect their lifestyle rather than see new people enter their ranks to possibly compete with them. This is compared to a larger middle class, who take on their own set of characteristics. When the size of the middle class reaches a certain point – there’s not a definite number - they start feed off each others’ success. The result is the middle class becomes more innovative, entrepreneurial and driven by competition.

The entrepreneurial spirit associate with the middle class is a key component to development success. Entrepreneurs generally start up small and medium size corporations that in the aggregate employ a large portion of the population. These smaller businesses also tend to be more competitive than large inefficient firms that dominate the business landscape when the middle class does not represent a good portion of the economy. In a capitalist system healthy competition often leads to innovation and the desire to move up the value added latter, from small storefronts or simple textile manufacturing - characteristic of sweat shops - to more technical consumer electronics and industrial goods. Taiwan and South Korea are prefect examples of countries that moved up that value added latter and into well functioning economies.

Also important, is the middle classes’ desire for self improvement, when families move into the middle class category, they generally become healthier and better educated; increasing the country’s human capital, and making for a more productive workforce. The middle class generally take the philosophy that a rising tide raises all boats and are more willing to support universal education. The rich on the other hand oppose educating the masses and instead advocate for private education for their children – this is also probably related to competition.

There is no doubt the middle class is important to development but the economic crisis is threatening their ability to grow and possibly maintain their current numbers. The economic crisis started in the US but has reached to almost every economy in the world. Some emerging market economies like Brazil thought they would escape the problems, believing that they had decoupled from the global economy; a few months ago when asked about how the crisis will affect Brazil, President Lula responded “go ask Bush… it is his crisis, not mine.” However this has not been the case for Brazil and several other emerging markets, globalization has connected just about all economies – except for maybe North Korea.

The economic crisis has affected emerging markets - with susceptible middle classes - in a variety of ways. The most obvious is decrease output, many emerging market economies depend on exports for continued economic growth - with the US being the primary destination for finished goods. As the recession becomes deeper, demand for their goods decreases therefore business are forced to cut production and eventually cut middle class jobs. The situation is becoming so bad that the World Bank is forecasting that global trade will decrease for the first time since 1982.

The banking system is a very important component to economic growth and because the current crisis started in the banking system, the credit markets are virtually frozen. Companies and individuals are finding it difficult to get access to credit because emerging markets are seen as a risky investment. But businesses need access to credit so they can stock shelves or buy inputs for production; consumers need credit to purchase big ticket items like cars or refrigerators and with a lack capital in the system emerging market economies will not be able to continue at their current pace. Banks in some counties like Brazil isolated themselves from sub-prime investments but their bank spread – number of points between federal funds rate and hat is actually charged to the customer – are extremely high, making it difficult to get loans out to the people who need them.

To conclude, the middle class continues to play an important role in development and will hopefully remain resilient even through these tough economic times. The middle class is what makes a society great, the author of one of the Economist articles “Beyond Wisteria Lane” says it best: the middle class create a “society in which people hope their children will do better than they have done themselves; which believes in merit, not privilege; competition not inheritance; thrift not conspicuous consumption and which applauds personal effort rather than collective endeavor.”

Monday, March 30, 2009

Could Solar Power Africa???

The Center for Global Development’s website features the book Africa’s Private Sector: What’s Wrong with the Business Environment and What to do about it. The central thesis looks at Africa’s solar potential and how their development efforts have been cut short because of a lack of consistent electricity. Obviously electricity is not the only impediment to Africa’s development success – war and corruption to name just two - but it could be a way for African countries to increase their economic activity. The author projects that Africa has the capacity to generate six times more solar power than Europe, enough to provide for all the continent’s needs and be able to export the surplus. As global warming awareness increases and the search for clean energy solutions on the rises, this could be the ticket African countries need to jump start their economies.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Axis of Evil to Upheaval???

As unemployment and political discontents escalate, a prolonged global economic crisis increases the likelihood of future failed states. Foreign Policy Magazine recently published an article “Axis of Upheaval” that argues the US should be more concerned with economic problems in a few underdeveloped countries than the three states former president Bush named as "The Axis of Evil" – Iran, Iraq and North Korea. One of the countries mentioned is a major concern for the US because of its close proximity and the potential for violence to spill over the border. Mexico has been ravaged by a multi-front war between the government and drug cartels; the violence has become so serious that it has called into question the legitimacy of Mexico’s government to handle the issue. This could have disastrous consequences for the second largest economy in Latin America – violence makes investors uneasy, increasing the likelihood they may pull money out of the economy, adding to country's economic problems.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Corruption and Underdevelopment

Corruption is a major contributor to underdevelopment and the cycle of poverty that plagues a host of developing countries. The Economist recently ran an article featuring the subject of aid, political graft and how large amounts of money get funneled by into western banks. Rather than putting all the blame on corrupt officials, the author says much of the blame should be placed on banks that enable and even court corrupt leaders. Paul Collier, author of The Bottom Billion, calls such banks “pimps” because they profit from the large sums of money that enter their institutions. America’s Riggs Bank – ironically had honest Abe Lincoln as a former customer – was mentioned for stashing away millions for former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Will the Microfinance Industry Get More “Micro” as a Result of the Financial Crisis?

Since Mohammed Yunnis won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 for creating the Grameen Bank – a micro-lending institution that has lifted hundreds of thousands of people out of abject poverty - microfinance has increased in popularity. But will micro-lending programs be able to survive throughout the current financial crisis? Microfinance is the act of lending small sums of money to people that would otherwise be ineligible for conventional loans, allowing individuals to purchase capital equipment/ supplies so they can earn a living. The first micro-lending institutions were developed for philanthropic reasons but the industry has increasingly become commercialized. Since microfinance has shifted from charity to more of a business, the industry is more dependent on world capital markets. And because there are two types of institutions, those that are for-profit and those that are non-profit, experts are divided on how microfinance will react to the current economic crisis.

A good place to start this analysis is by looking at history. The most relevant example is to see how well microfinance did during the Asian Financial Crisis? In a report published by The Foundation for Development Cooperation, Paul McGuire and John Conroy make some interesting observations regarding financial crises in general, noting that recession leads to increased unemployment in the formal employment sector, therefore more candidates for microfinance in the informal sector. Sounds good for microfinance but things are not that simple, recession also means people have less purchasing power and more people trying eek out a living on the streets means there is more competition. But what actually occurred?

David Roodman of Center for Global Development notes that in Indonesia “while large companies and rich people defaulted left and right, the 2.6 million micro-credit borrowers of the Bank Rakyat Indonesia hardly skipped a beat.” This is not surprising since many micro-loan programs, like the Grameen Bank, are structured around group lending where there is communal pressure to repay. Although there may have been some problems, micro-credit faired pretty well in this particular instance.

Seeing how micro-finance reacted to the Asian Financial Crisis is a good barometer for how things might turn out but current circumstances are unique. For instance, the Asian Financial Crisis was relegated to emerging markets compared to the current economic crisis which stems from problems in US financial system. So the debate really comes from the unique nature of the current crisis and how the micro-credit industry has evolved since the last crisis.

There are people on both sides of the debate, Muhammad Yunus is a vocal advocate of the micro-credit industry and publicly announced “The financial crisis has not hit the microfinance system” and that “in the middle of all these bad news: microfinance still works.” Bill Clinton believes investors should look to microfinance saying “consider the poor of developing nations as viable investment alternatives to today’s turbulent markets.”

Besides believing celebrity advocates like Dr. Yunus and Bill Clinton, there are structural reasons why one could be optimistic about the future of microfinance. David Roodman points to the fact that most foreign investment still comes from those who are motivated by charity and willing to accept the risks involved with lending to the poor. Others like Benjamin Kahn and Tor Jansson of The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) argue that microfinance “will benefit from close ties with their local communities, from knowing their borrowers well, from having an ownership structure that includes shareholders with a strong interest in their well-being, from conforming to local financial regulations and from making good use of local savings.” So once again the structure of the micro-credit industry may insulate it from high default rates. But is that shifting?

There are good reasons to believe microfinance will be resilient; however there are also a variety of reasons to be cautious. True, charitable foundations are willing to take risks but many of the endowments charities rely on have shrunk because of sharp decreases in world stock prices. So they may be willing to take risks but may not have the capital to finance such risky loans. Foreign governments have also been large contributors to development projects but will more than likely be forced to cut international aid budgets because their own economies are at risk of collapse. In addition to philanthropic related problems, the micro-lending industry has become increasingly tied to the conventional financial system.

Sarah Bauele of the University of North Carolina, makes three important observations that could affect repayment and micro-lending’s sustainability during the financial crisis: rising food prices means that individuals have less money once basic needs are taken care of; increasing unemployment in rich countries means that money sent as remittances is declining, cutting off a needed source of capital; the commercialization of microfinance means that the industry is affected by the lack of credit in the global financial system.

Echoing the last point made by Bauele, Fitch's Financial Institutions Group, agrees that microfinance will be affected by its ties to the global financial system but believes that a cool down may not necessarily be a bad thing, stating "In a way, it will be a much-needed "taking of stock" after several years of strong growth."

Kate McKee, a senior fellow at the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor wrote an article reinforcing that sentiment, making interesting parallels with the US sub-prime mess and potential problems with micro-finance if it were allowed to get out of control. McKee notes that micro-lenders, like sub-prime lenders, target barrower that may not be the most credit worthy - but in the case of micro-loans that is kind of the point, lending to people that would otherwise not have access to credit. McKee is an advocate for micro-lending so she does not want to see the practice end but emphasizes that lenders should be cautious and make sure borrowers know their rights and obligations before approving loans. This could be key to making sure the for-profit micro-credit industry is sustainable because as large amounts of money get pumped into microfinance - similar to the sub-prime market - lenders could get over ambitious and lend to people they know can not repay and will subsequently defaulted. She also mentions that the microfinance industry could have taken on another characteristic of the sub-prime market due to the small sums of money involved. Traditional lending institutions or investment houses can’t really be bothered with loans for $50-$100 so they could be bundled into more complex securities like the toxic assets that have plagued the banking industry.

In addition to similarities with the sub-prime industry, the changing dynamic of micro-lending and that it is becoming more like the conventional financial system puts its sustainability in jeopardy, Christoph Kneiding notes that “while 9 out of 10 BRAC-only clients repay their loans regularly, repayment drops to 50% for households with membership in three or more MFIs other than BRAC.” There are two observations that can be made about this statement. Similar to US consumer credit cards, repayment was high when credit was not readily available but when multiple lines of credit were offered, borrowers can become overloaded and not able to repay. The changing dynamic of micro-lending can also affect repayment - traditional micro-lending programs used peer pressure as a mechanism for repayment but as microfinance becomes more like a traditional finance - barrowers are removed and don’t feel quite as obligated to repay, especially since there are no formal credit reporting agencies in many countries. So for these few reasons, it may be a good thing for the micro-lending industry to cool down.

This analysis is by no means a comprehensive study of microfinance but hopefully it presented some interesting ideas and possible influences as the industyr tries to weather through the financial crisis. As you can see there are many things to look at to evaluate the future prospects of microfinance; it is caught between two worlds -- business and charity. Depending on what angle or what context, one can make totally different conclusions. My personal opinion is that it will make it through just fine, it may run into some problems but as the saying goes “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Is Democracy Important???

Center for Global Development recently sponsored a book on young democracies and how they are finding it difficult to keep democratic institutions alive. But how important is democracy to development, many of the so called “Asian Tigers” like Singapore and Taiwan were able to thrive with an authoritarian regime. Officials were able to push through tough economic programs that voters may not be willing to support. I guess the question is “are these autocratic governments acting in the interest of the people or their own” or I guess a more direct question would be “is there an actual development strategy involved or are decisions being made to line the pocket of those in power??” Q&A on the CGD website indirectly answers some of these questions, if you’re interested follow the link below.

http://www.cgdev.org/content/opinion/detail/1421059/

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

It's Good to be the Leader...


Zimbabwe, one of the poorest countries in the world will probably stay that way because of genius decision made by its leader Robert Mugabe. With seven million Zimbabweans living on international food aid, Mugabe’s people are planning a birthday bash that will probably come close to that country’s GDP for the day. The list of items include:
  • 2,000 bottles of champagne — Moët & Chandon and ’61 Bollinger
  • 500 bottles of whisky — Johnny Walker Blue Label, 22-year-old Chivas
  • 8,000 lobsters
  • 100kg king prawns
  • 3,000 ducks
  • 4,000 portions of caviar
  • 8,000 boxes of Ferrero Rocher
  • 16,000 eggs
  • 3,000 cakes — chocolate and vanilla
  • 4,000 packs of pork sausages

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article5697712.ece